New EEP draft: Pinning operator ^ in patterns

[Raimo Niskanen]

On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 04:07:39AM +0100, empro2@REDACTED wrote:
> :-)
> 
:
> 
> > Someone has an immaculate plan.
> 
> EEP 55 looks very sleek, less self-criticism than an orange president, only lacking the pull, merge, announce, release tail. And at the root of this thread, there is unfortunately much talk of implementation ... This startled me a bit, too, and I tried to send SIGSTOP wrapped in a humorous ... wrapping, and exerted quite some effort to quickly gather and summarise some pros and cons to start a more critical discussion
> 
> (http://erlang.org/pipermail/erlang-questions/2021-January/100399.html)
> 
> Now I see there are checks and balances in place, and this thread has grown to make Yggdrasil look like a bunch of twigs.
> 
> Your position is as clear as Richard Carlsson's (as owner of EEP 55). I would really like to hear more about the why. In a perfect world I would suggest you two swap your positions: the result would be wonderful.
> 
>     ~Michael

That was a better answer than mine that I just sent.
Sorry I got agitated again...

> 
> --
> 
> Reasonable is that which cannot be criticised reasonably anymore.
> 
> Vernüftig ist das, was nicht mehr vernünftig kritisiert werden kann.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 

-- 

/ Raimo Niskanen, Erlang/OTP, Ericsson AB