New EEP draft: Pinning operator ^ in patterns
Fri Jan 22 10:09:00 CET 2021
On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 02:28:35AM +0900, zxq9 wrote:
> On 2021/01/22 1:43, Tristan Sloughter wrote:
> > I've tried to just say my piece and leave it at that (summary: not a fan
> > but would be nice to have a way to match in fun heads/list
> > comprehensions where variables are shadowed) but have to say that after
> > seeing these examples I'm starting to lean towards agreeing with Richard.
> I'm the opposite, but it probably doesn't matter.
Why should it not matter?
What might matter would be stating good arguments for one's reasoning.
> Someone has an immaculate plan.
Instead of such statements.
You are attempting the Trump argumentation line:
Repeat a lie until it is accepted as true.
I hate that. Please stop doing that!
/ Raimo Niskanen, Erlang/OTP, Ericsson AB
More information about the erlang-questions