Kill a NIF's process

Max Lapshin max.lapshin@REDACTED
Wed Apr 21 21:37:02 CEST 2021


We have a nice hardware that requires asynchronous termination, so we
wrap each NIF object inside a process that "is not supposed to die"
and this process becomes a wrapper that tracks its own erlang-level
ref count.

On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 7:37 PM Sverker Eriksson
<sverker.eriksson@REDACTED> wrote:
>
> At process termination the deallocation of the heap is delayed until a running dirty NIF has returned. This to make sure the dirty NIF can safely continue read its arguments.
>
>
>
> The firing of links and monitors (including NIF monitor down calls), on the other hand, are not delayed by a running dirty NIF.
>
>
>
> I hope that answered the question.
>
>
>
> /Sverker, Erlang/OTP
>
>
>
> From: erlang-questions <erlang-questions-bounces@REDACTED> On Behalf Of Robert Harris
> Sent: den 21 april 2021 18:06
> To: erlang-questions@REDACTED
> Subject: Kill a NIF's process
>
>
>
> Hello all.
>
> Suppose there is a dirty NIF that is associated with a resource object
> initialised with a down callback. Further, the NIF is passed some term
> that it spends a long time examining; for the sake of argument, it
> repeatedly reads the memory underlying a binary.
>
> If the process is killed, e.g. by exit/2, is the NIF's resource object's
> down callback called before the VM releases terms in the victim's
> environment (e.g. the term whose memory the NIF is reading)? If so,
> does releasing block on the down callback?
>
> Regards,
>
> Robert Harris
> Confidentiality Notice | This email and any included attachments may be privileged, confidential and/or otherwise protected from disclosure. Access to this email by anyone other than the intended recipient is unauthorized. If you believe you have received this email in error, please contact the sender immediately and delete all copies. If you are not the intended recipient, you are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited.
>
> Disclaimer
>
> The information contained in this communication from the sender is confidential. It is intended solely for use by the recipient and others authorized to receive it. If you are not the recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or taking action in relation of the contents of this information is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful.
>
> This email has been scanned for viruses and malware, and may have been automatically archived by Mimecast, a leader in email security and cyber resilience. Mimecast integrates email defenses with brand protection, security awareness training, web security, compliance and other essential capabilities. Mimecast helps protect large and small organizations from malicious activity, human error and technology failure; and to lead the movement toward building a more resilient world. To find out more, visit our website.


More information about the erlang-questions mailing list