[erlang-questions] Coon - new tool for building Erlang packages, dependency management and deploying Erlang services

[Chris Duesing]

I can't believe this "discussion" is happening. Coon is a racial slur,
there is no other use of the word. The fact that a bunch of white Europeans
are pointing out that the dozen people involved in this thread aren't
offended simply shows the lack of diversity in the mailing list. The "oh
I'm butthurt because other people get offended by things" is fucking
ridiculous. It is a racial slur, period. If this isn't a library only
intended to be used by racist fucks then rename it.

On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 10:28 AM, nx <nx@REDACTED> wrote:

> For what it's worth, the first thing I thought of when I saw the title of
> this thread was "that is a racist slur". I've also never heard anyone call
> a raccoon a coon.
>
> The news that cowboy was named for "cowboys kill apaches" is disappointing.
>
> On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 11:22 AM Fred Hebert <mononcqc@REDACTED> wrote:
>
>> What I'm saying is that it does not matter how I interpret things. I
>> asked and the author said publicly it was a raccoon. I'm okay with that
>> explanation and I'm ready to believe it.
>>
>> My point is that other people won't ask the author, won't know who he is,
>> and will pick an interpretation and stick with it. They won't need the
>> context, they won't need anything. They'll just do it. The name can be
>> interpreted in a racist way, and so it's pretty much guaranteed that it
>> will be eventually interpreted that way. The author is free to go ahead and
>> keep the name, and the users and onlookers will be free to read whatever
>> they want in that name.
>>
>> That is 100% my point.
>>
>> On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 11:17 AM, Krzysztof Jurewicz <
>> krzysztof.jurewicz@REDACTED> wrote:
>>
>>> Fred Hebert writes:
>>>
>>> > Anyone is of course free to name their software whatever they want.
>>> Picking
>>> > a racist name is however never going to be consequences-free as this
>>> e-mail
>>> > thread first shows on the first day of release, and adoption figures
>>> may
>>> > also reflect it.
>>>
>>> Merriam-Webster online dictionary (naming itself as “America’s
>>> most-trusted online dictionary”) says that there two meanings of “coon”:
>>>
>>> ⒈ raccoon;
>>> ⒉ offensive — used as an insulting and contemptuous term for a black
>>> person.
>>>
>>> I presume that context matters. What makes you think that in this
>>> context this word means ⒉? Wikipedia in the article about raccoon says that
>>> is also known coloquially as “coon”, so I guess this is not a very uncommon
>>> usage.
>>>
>>> Or are you saying that non-racist usages of words that have also racist
>>> meanings should be eventually abandoned?
>>>
>>> (I’m not a native speaker, so bear with my eventual ignorance).
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> erlang-questions mailing list
>> erlang-questions@REDACTED
>> http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> erlang-questions mailing list
> erlang-questions@REDACTED
> http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://erlang.org/pipermail/erlang-questions/attachments/20180212/35cfaf8a/attachment.htm>