[erlang-questions] Contributor License Agreement for pullrequests
Tue Nov 28 15:19:23 CET 2017
There's not a huge difference as far as I can see. In particular, I don't
see that a CLA necessarily suggests any copyright assignment, even if this
is sometimes done.
This page gives a good comparison:
2017-11-28 12:02 GMT+01:00 Tuncer Ayaz <tuncer.ayaz@REDACTED>:
> On 11/28/17, Tuncer Ayaz <tuncer.ayaz@REDACTED> wrote:
> > On 11/28/17, Henrik Nord X wrote:
> > > To make sure that the code is free to use for the community and us.
> > > That you ensure that it is your code to submit.
> > > And that you agree to the licence in question for the code you
> > > submit to Erlang/OTP. (Apache License 2.0)
> > So it's just a DCO (Developer's Certificate of Origin) and not a CLA.
> > Correct?
> Sorry, forgot:
> If it's a DCO, then "Contributor License Agreement" is an unfortunate
> email subject, since that suggests there might be copyright
> erlang-questions mailing list
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the erlang-questions