[erlang-questions] Contributor License Agreement for pullrequests

[Richard Carlsson]

There's not a huge difference as far as I can see. In particular, I don't
see that a CLA necessarily suggests any copyright assignment, even if this
is sometimes done.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Contributor_License_Agreement

This page gives a good comparison:
https://julien.ponge.org/blog/developer-certificate-of-origin-versus-contributor-license-agreements/

        /Richard

2017-11-28 12:02 GMT+01:00 Tuncer Ayaz <tuncer.ayaz@REDACTED>:

> On 11/28/17, Tuncer Ayaz <tuncer.ayaz@REDACTED> wrote:
> > On 11/28/17, Henrik Nord X wrote:
> >
> > > To make sure that the code is free to use for the community and us.
> > > That you ensure that it is your code to submit.
> > > And that you agree to the licence in question for the code you
> > > submit to Erlang/OTP. (Apache License 2.0)
> >
> > So it's just a DCO (Developer's Certificate of Origin)[1] and not a CLA.
> >
> > Correct?
>
> Sorry, forgot:
>
> If it's a DCO, then "Contributor License Agreement" is an unfortunate
> email subject, since that suggests there might be copyright
> assignment.
> _______________________________________________
> erlang-questions mailing list
> erlang-questions@REDACTED
> http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://erlang.org/pipermail/erlang-questions/attachments/20171128/7684744a/attachment.htm>