[erlang-questions] erl_tracer, trace_status and pids
Tue May 30 11:40:31 CEST 2017
On 05/30/2017 10:14 AM, Loïc Hoguin wrote:
>> * trace_status is always called before any other enabled_*/3 so I
>> should be fine just doing nothing in enabled_*/3, right? I'm only
>> checking that the tracer processes are still alive anyway.
>> no, trace_status is not always called before enabled_*. The only event
>> that I know of where it is called is enabled_call/3, there may be a
>> couple of more but not all of them.
> Alright. I'm a bit confused still. Would it make sense to only perform
> some checks for trace_status, for example checking that the tracer
> process exists? Then for other enabled_*/3 calls I would just reject
> events I don't need.
>> Basically if you could shed light on the circumstances around
>> trace_status that would help a lot for optimizing this. :-)
>> the check for trace_status call is made in various places in the vm
>> code where the VM finds it convenient to do a check and see if the
>> tracer is still alive. There are no specific rules about when it is
> It sounds like the answer to my question is a yes. :-)
I think what I was looking for can be found in this sentence of the
"It is called in multiple scenarios, but most significantly it is used
when tracing is started using this tracer."
If correct, then this means trace_status is always called at least once
before anything happens; and that's good enough for me. That would allow
me to remove traces for the tracer processes immediately when receiving
the trace_status, and not have to worry about that in enabled_*/3 calls.
More information about the erlang-questions