[erlang-questions] Atom Unicode Support

José Valim jose.valim@REDACTED
Mon Feb 1 16:48:01 CET 2016

> I prefer 4 because it is the simplest. For most modules, the
> chunk will be smaller than for option 3.

Should we always emit the new chunk or only if there are unicode atoms?

A nice side-effect of this solution is that it would also allow Unicode
module names as well.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://erlang.org/pipermail/erlang-questions/attachments/20160201/1848d10c/attachment.htm>

More information about the erlang-questions mailing list