[erlang-questions] New EEP 45 - FUNCTION macro

Björn Gustavsson bjorn@REDACTED
Fri Nov 6 11:17:21 CET 2015

(I've been home with a cold all week.)

On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 2:59 AM, Richard A. O'Keefe <ok@REDACTED> wrote:

> For Erlang, I respectfully suggest that it makes more sense
> to have *two* macros:
>         ?FUNCTION_NAME => the name of the containing function
>         ?FUNCTION_ARITY => the arity of the containing function

That makes sense for the reasons you mentioned
in your email. I will revise the EEP.


More information about the erlang-questions mailing list