[erlang-questions] Strange problems with modifying records with matched maps on 17.4

[Jesper Louis Andersen]

Running 'master' of my maps_eqc test against that branch seems to work. I
had to fix a problem with generation of function2/1 values[0], but now the
model doesn't find any problem in release 17.4.1.

[0] It would seem functions are seeded by self(), which is differing in my
model.

On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 6:09 PM, Björn-Egil Dahlberg <egil@REDACTED>
wrote:

>  On current maint + egil/fix-term-cmp/OTP-12623 (what jesper reported):
>
> egil/fix-term-cmp/OTP-12623 egil@REDACTED
> /ldisk/egil/git/otp/erts/emulator $ ../../bin/erl -s map_test1 main
> Erlang/OTP 17 [erts-6.3.1] [source-8c0c99b] [64-bit] [smp:8:8]
> [async-threads:10] [hipe] [kernel-poll:false]
>
> Created: {r1,#{count => 1},0}
> Modified: {r1,#{count => 2},0}
> Eshell V6.3.1  (abort with ^G)
> 1>
>
> Seems ok.
>
> // Björn-Egil
>
>
> On 2015-03-24 12:38, Max Lapshin wrote:
>
> Thanks
>
> On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 2:25 PM, Sergej Jurečko <sergej.jurecko@REDACTED>
> wrote:
>
>>  Yes this is likely the same bug that I reported in february:
>> http://erlang.org/pipermail/erlang-bugs/2015-February/004768.html
>>
>>
>>  Sergej
>>
>>  On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 12:21 PM, Max Lapshin <max.lapshin@REDACTED>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>  https://gist.github.com/maxlapshin/a95d8a27ce93221d883a
>>>
>>>  when I match map in record:
>>>
>>>  modify(#r1{map_data = #{count := Cnt} = M}=R1) ->
>>>
>>>  I get badarg when modify record in the end of function.
>>>
>>>  I've attached two files looking similar in the gist.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>  When I launch first, I get badarg with the line of function header:
>>>
>>>  erl -s map_test1 main
>>>
>>> Erlang/OTP 17 [erts-6.3] [source] [64-bit] [smp:4:4] [ds:4:4:10]
>>> [async-threads:10] [hipe] [kernel-poll:false] [dtrace]
>>>
>>> Created: {r1,#{count => 1},0}
>>>
>>> {"init terminating in
>>> do_boot",{badarg,[{map_test1,modify,1,[{file,"map_test1.erl"},{line,11}]},{map_test1,main,0,[{file,"map_test1.erl"},{line,8}]},{init,start_it,1,[]},{init,start_em,1,[]}]}}
>>>
>>>
>>>  when I launch second, it works (but makes useless work).
>>>
>>>
>>>  Is it a known bug? Or maybe it is not a bug, but just my
>>> misunderstanding?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>  _______________________________________________
>>> erlang-questions mailing list
>>> erlang-questions@REDACTED
>>> http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> erlang-questions mailing listerlang-questions@REDACTED://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> erlang-questions mailing list
> erlang-questions@REDACTED
> http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions
>
>


-- 
J.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://erlang.org/pipermail/erlang-questions/attachments/20150324/caf593f8/attachment.htm>