[erlang-questions] Erlang package manager
Sat Jan 3 12:55:22 CET 2015
On 01/03/2015 12:53 PM, Anthony Ramine wrote:
> Le 3 janv. 2015 à 10:47, Imants Cekusins <imantc@REDACTED> a écrit :
>> Wouldn't it be handy if the new PM used Erlang syntax to specify configuration?
>> I.e., config could be an .hrl or .erl file.
>> There would be defined types for config items. Maybe use records.
>> Then Dialyzer could be used to validate config.
>> The .app spec file could specify the config file(s) used for this .app
> Turing-complete package descriptions sound like asking for problems.
it was only a question of SYNTAX, as far as i understand it.
and, yes re-use of already existing syntax is nice.
More information about the erlang-questions