[erlang-questions] Updating external references in Erlang docs

[Roger Lipscombe]

If Erlang still runs on Windows 95 or 98 (or ME, ick), then that note
is still important, since it's how you differentiate between that
heritage and the NT one. If not, then I guess it should be dropped.

The Unix one should probably be updated to compare a more-recent
Solaris (11, apparently?) vs. OSX vs. Linux.

On 6 February 2015 at 16:09, Derek Brown <derek@REDACTED> wrote:
> There are numerous outdated references in the official documentation.
>
> For example:
> http://www.erlang.org/doc/man/os.html#type-0
>
> refers to Solaris 1 and 2, and Windows 95. Solaris 2 was updated by Solaris
> 7 in 1998, and Windows 95 is from the same period.
>
> I've personally made numerous smaller doc changes, but submit for comment
> more general ones such as these.
>
> Derek
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> erlang-questions mailing list
> erlang-questions@REDACTED
> http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions
>