[erlang-questions] Should 17.0.2 advertise erts-6.0.1 or erts-6.0.2?

[Tuncer Ayaz]

On 5/27/14, Lukas Larsson wrote:
> On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 7:03 PM, Tuncer Ayaz wrote:
>
> > Is it in line with the new versioning policy that both 17.0.1 and
> > 17.0.2 advertise erts-6.0.1? Shouldn't 17.0.2 have erts-6.0.2?
> >
>
> Application versions are only bumped when something is changed in
> them. In 17.0.2 there was no change to erts and thus that version
> number has not been bumped.

It appears that I haven't fully memorized the new policy (yet) :).
Releases like 17.0.2 weren't public in the past, so we didn't see a
release that doesn't modify erts. Thanks for the explanation.