[erlang-questions] Erlang make out

[Lloyd R. Prentice]

Point well taken, tx,  but I really wasn't thinking so much about standards. However ill phrased, I I was wondering about the technical strengths and weakness of the various approaches, particularly in contrast to Erlang make.

But do appreciate your response.

All the best,

Lloyd

Sent from my iPad

> On Apr 12, 2014, at 11:56 AM, t x <txrev319@REDACTED> wrote:
> 
> https://xkcd.com/927/ :-)
> 
>> On Sat, Apr 12, 2014 at 4:05 AM, Erik Søe Sørensen <eriksoe@REDACTED> wrote:
>> [Off-topic] Wellp, there's my next Erlang project name: yada - "yet another
>> distributed application" ;-)
>> 
>> Den 12/04/2014 08.25 skrev <lloyd@REDACTED>:
>> 
>>> Hello,
>>> 
>>> A heap of Googling and a recent thread on Erlang Questions suggests that
>>> there is little unanimity on the best way to organize and make large
>>> (multiple application) Erlang systems--- Erlang make, GNU make, Sinan,
>>> Rebar, erlang.mk, erl.mk, yada, yada. Enough to give a noob a colossal
>>> headache.
>>> 
>>> Two questions:
>>> 
>>> 1) Is this a matter of reinventing the wheel? Or are there sound technical
>>> reasons for so many options?
>>> 
>>> 2) Is there an emerging consensus?
>>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>> 
>>> LRP
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> erlang-questions mailing list
>>> erlang-questions@REDACTED
>>> http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> erlang-questions mailing list
>> erlang-questions@REDACTED
>> http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions
>>