[erlang-questions] Erlang make out
Lloyd R. Prentice
Sun Apr 13 06:24:00 CEST 2014
Point well taken, tx, but I really wasn't thinking so much about standards. However ill phrased, I I was wondering about the technical strengths and weakness of the various approaches, particularly in contrast to Erlang make.
But do appreciate your response.
All the best,
Sent from my iPad
> On Apr 12, 2014, at 11:56 AM, t x <txrev319@REDACTED> wrote:
> https://xkcd.com/927/ :-)
>> On Sat, Apr 12, 2014 at 4:05 AM, Erik Søe Sørensen <eriksoe@REDACTED> wrote:
>> [Off-topic] Wellp, there's my next Erlang project name: yada - "yet another
>> distributed application" ;-)
>> Den 12/04/2014 08.25 skrev <lloyd@REDACTED>:
>>> A heap of Googling and a recent thread on Erlang Questions suggests that
>>> there is little unanimity on the best way to organize and make large
>>> (multiple application) Erlang systems--- Erlang make, GNU make, Sinan,
>>> Rebar, erlang.mk, erl.mk, yada, yada. Enough to give a noob a colossal
>>> Two questions:
>>> 1) Is this a matter of reinventing the wheel? Or are there sound technical
>>> reasons for so many options?
>>> 2) Is there an emerging consensus?
>>> erlang-questions mailing list
>> erlang-questions mailing list
More information about the erlang-questions