[erlang-questions] compile: making asm and core official

[Peer Stritzinger]

On 2013-11-23 11:28:36 +0000, Anthony Ramine said:

> I disagree but if we change those, we should rather use ".cerl" for ".core".

I actually don't care much what they are, as long as they don't collide 
with widely used extensions for other stuff and (minimum requirement is 
to avoid the extensions used by the implicit rules of BSD and GNU make).

Also they shouldn't be too confusing which in my opinion makes ".cerl" 
a bad coice.

Why not use ".ecore" and ". srl" or ".easm" or whatever colour the 
bikeshed should have as long as its black.

Cheers
-- Peer