[erlang-questions] Erlang package managers?

[Dmitry Kolesnikov]

Hello,

Beauty of git + rebar is peer-to-peer solution. You are not bound to single repository (the concept of trust and security is other topic). 
Additionally rebar + reltool is very flexible to produce a "deployable tar ball". The vars overlay concept allows you to generate dev / stage and prod deployable packages following same workflow.  No-doubt that concept of dependencies is not very flexible like with yum. On-another hand it is good enough to assemble relatively large VM nodes. 

It would be very good to get idea what issue you had with rebar on dependencies management.

- Dmitry


On May 29, 2013, at 12:11 PM, Olav Frengstad <olav@REDACTED> wrote:

> I'v previously been using Rebar to handle source dependencies, but recently started working on an alternative solution called EPM [1] which fixes some of the issues I had with Rebar's dependency management.
> 
> [1] https://github.com/lafka/epm
> 
> 
> 2013/5/29 Dominic Williams <mail@REDACTED>
> Le 28 mai 2013 à 23:42, Michael Truog a écrit :
> 
> > QuickCheck is commercial, so you won't find a package for free, unless you try to get the Haskell version (Haskell is the free version, but Erlang is the commercial version).
> 
> QuickCheck mini, which contains all the basic features, is free and can be downloaded from QuviQ's web site.
> 
> Regards,
> Dominic Williams
> http://dominicwilliams.net
> 
> _______________________________________________
> erlang-questions mailing list
> erlang-questions@REDACTED
> http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Med Vennlig Hilsen
> Olav Frengstad
> 
> Systemutvikler // FWT
> +47 920 42 090
> _______________________________________________
> erlang-questions mailing list
> erlang-questions@REDACTED
> http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://erlang.org/pipermail/erlang-questions/attachments/20130529/b369f709/attachment.htm>