[erlang-questions] why my test case of socket are always slower much than c++
Peter
syupei@REDACTED
Tue Jun 18 13:45:31 CEST 2013
i test for the socket rec/sed speed,
i used c++、Erlang and golang, and the result like this:
so, i want know, why always slow when erlang as a rec-server. is use
wrong?
my source code see attachment, and my test case like this:
the erlang server:
erl +K true
server:start(8080, 200)
the erlang client:
erl +K true
client:start(192.168.0.1, 8080, 200, 1000*10000)
the cpp server:
./server 192.168.0.1 8080 200
the cpp client:
./client 192.168.0.1 8080 10000000 200
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://erlang.org/pipermail/erlang-questions/attachments/20130618/ae11c218/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: client.erl
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 737 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://erlang.org/pipermail/erlang-questions/attachments/20130618/ae11c218/attachment.obj>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: server.erl
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 1232 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://erlang.org/pipermail/erlang-questions/attachments/20130618/ae11c218/attachment-0001.obj>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: client.cpp
Type: text/x-c++src
Size: 1728 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://erlang.org/pipermail/erlang-questions/attachments/20130618/ae11c218/attachment.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: server.cpp
Type: text/x-c++src
Size: 1818 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://erlang.org/pipermail/erlang-questions/attachments/20130618/ae11c218/attachment-0001.bin>
More information about the erlang-questions
mailing list