[erlang-questions] binary typed schema-less protocol
Tue Jul 30 10:27:09 CEST 2013
On 30 Jul 2013, at 07:58, Richard A. O'Keefe <ok@REDACTED> wrote:
> On 30/07/2013, at 2:25 AM, Wojtek Narczyński wrote:
>> It makes me wonder, what is wrong with ASN.1?
> The original poster explicitly asked for a >> schema-less << protocol.
> ASN.1 is very much schema-based.
True. Our approach does not require a schema, but enables schema-based validation.
Regarding Yang vs ASN.1, there are several diskussion threads not least in the Yang diskussion forums on why a new language would be better for NETCONF than using e.g. ASN.1. I'm sure Martin Björklund* could give a dissertation on the topic, since he is the main author of the Yang RFC. Whether he wants to is another matter. :)
Personally, I really prefer Yang over ASN.1.
* For those of you who don't know, Martin was one of the architects of the first OTP releases, as well as the author of OTP's SNMP application.
Ulf Wiger, Co-founder & Developer Advocate, Feuerlabs Inc.
More information about the erlang-questions