[erlang-questions] Safe way to cache atoms in NIF: driver_mk_atom replacement
Fri May 4 16:51:40 CEST 2012
On Fri, May 04, 2012 at 03:35:17PM +0200, Lukas Larsson wrote:
> If I understand you correctly the answer is yes.
> I think the crypto implementation does exactly this and since
> Sverker wrote both crypto and the NIF support I would say that it is
> safe :)
> On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 3:22 PM, Max Lapshin <max.lapshin@REDACTED> wrote:
> > Is there a way to cache atoms in NIF?
> > Is it ok just to store in static variable result of enif_make_atom ?
Seems unlikely to remain true if EEP20 or atom GC is ever implemented.
It would be quite a chore to find all such instances then.
More information about the erlang-questions