[erlang-questions] Building, Packaging and Installing

Tim Watson watson.timothy@REDACTED
Wed May 2 22:03:44 CEST 2012

Eric Merit and I have had some lengthy discussions about this on the Erlware mailing list and have some ideas that I think are pretty solid. The thing is though, you don't just need tools - you also need people to package their stuff up using the tools. 

I'm sure this area will continue to improve over time though, especially as new tools (hopefully) emerge.

On 2 May 2012, at 19:39, Ciprian Dorin Craciun <ciprian.craciun@REDACTED> wrote:

>    (As no-one replied in 4 days, I'll add my opinion...)
> On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 4:36 PM, Tristan Sloughter
> <tristan.sloughter@REDACTED> wrote:
>> I started with this problem as something to simply discuss with the
>> maintainers of certain build and package management projects -- sinan and
>> agner specifically. But it seems to be more broad and cover how all of us
>> who keep apps on github handle versioning and dependencies.
>> The basic issue is app versions within .app files on branches in github, the
>> resultant directory from a agner install and the discrepancies this causes.
>> [...]
>> Am I the only one going crazy with this?
>    Nop. I've been faced with this problem myself a couple of times.
> (I've chosen to ignore it.)
>> Does anyone have
>> suggestions/examples of what they do for production projects on teams to
>> ease these annoyances?
>    For example for my project I have one big Git repository called
> `myproject-repositories` (replace `myproject` with what you need) with
> submodules pointing to the dependencies.
>    Then inside my own project repositories I have a symlink
> `.repositories` poiting to the "current" snapshot of dependencies.
>    I also don't use any of rebar, agner, etc., mainly because I've
> hacked something on-top of the ninja build system.
>> I mostly just create my own packages and repos of dependencies, or package
>> third party deps with the project.
>    Yup. +1 :)
>    P.S.: I hate Java from the bottom of my heart, but boy-o-boy is
> the Java tooling way better than that of Erlang... I mean what Erlang
> is missing is something similar to NodeJS's NPM, or Java's Maven
> (minus the XML baggage and all useless complexities), or Python
> setup-tools (with virtual environment), etc...
> _______________________________________________
> erlang-questions mailing list
> erlang-questions@REDACTED
> http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions

More information about the erlang-questions mailing list