[erlang-questions] Funargs: Ruby-like blocks for Erlang
Fri Jul 22 06:38:16 CEST 2011
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 9:28 PM, Richard O'Keefe <ok@REDACTED> wrote:
> I am more impressed by people who demonstrate that they understand how
> the current syntax actually *works* before they complain about it.
My complaint came in the form of a patch to Erlang's yecc grammar. I think
that demonstrates a degree of understanding that most Erlang programmers
don't have. I admit I made mistakes in some of my follow-up responses
because I wasn't referencing the grammar at the time I made the response.
Did I mention I implemented an entire language to the point of borderline
usability on the Erlang VM?
> On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 9:18 PM, Amy Lear <octopusfluff@REDACTED> wrote:
> > EVERYONE feels the pain on the issue of records.
> > Except Scumbag Ericsson:
> You pay them how much for support?
LOL okay dude. Are you happy with the rejection of your records proposals?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the erlang-questions