[erlang-questions] Funargs: Ruby-like blocks for Erlang

Tony Arcieri tony.arcieri@REDACTED
Fri Jul 22 06:38:16 CEST 2011

On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 9:28 PM, Richard O'Keefe <ok@REDACTED> wrote:

> I am more impressed by people who demonstrate that they understand how
> the current syntax actually *works* before they complain about it.

My complaint came in the form of a patch to Erlang's yecc grammar. I think
that demonstrates a degree of understanding that most Erlang programmers
don't have. I admit I made mistakes in some of my follow-up responses
because I wasn't referencing the grammar at the time I made the response.
Mea culpa.

Did I mention I implemented an entire language to the point of borderline
usability on the Erlang VM?

> On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 9:18 PM, Amy Lear <octopusfluff@REDACTED> wrote:
> > EVERYONE feels the pain on the issue of records.
> >
> > Except Scumbag Ericsson:
> You pay them how much for support?

LOL okay dude. Are you happy with the rejection of your records proposals?

Tony Arcieri
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://erlang.org/pipermail/erlang-questions/attachments/20110721/af356f7c/attachment.htm>

More information about the erlang-questions mailing list