[erlang-questions] catch supervisor failure

[Max Lapshin]

On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 9:47 AM, Bengt Kleberg
<bengt.kleberg@REDACTED> wrote:
> Would it be possible to have a supervisor between the master supervisor
> and the one that dies?
> This new supervisor could handle the behavior you described before, but
> has gotten lost from this email. It was something about 1 minute, I
> think.
>

I can add as much supervisors as required. But I don't understand how
to write my own callback, that will be called if some child
of supervisor is dead.