[erlang-questions] [erlang-questions 76] New Mailing list software

['Raimo Niskanen']

On Thu, Apr 07, 2011 at 08:46:42AM -0500, David Mercer wrote:
> Hi, Raimo.  The new software appears to mess with reply subjects.  Usually
> when you reply, the subject is changed from "<subject>" to "Re: <subject>"
> unless the subject already begins with "Re:".  This means replies to
> erlang-questions would have the form "Re: [erlang-questions] <subject>", and
> this is how it worked prior to the changeover.  However, the new software
> appears to move the "Re:" to between the "[erlang-questions]" and the
> subject, resulting in a subject line of "[erlang-questions] Re: <subject>".
> I'm not sure about other email clients, but Outlook 2007 will not,
> therefore, thread the replies with the original; all replies will be
> threaded correctly, but the original will stand alone in its own
> conversation.  Any chance we could have the functionality modified to retain
> the original format?

Yes. Done. I hope, will have to check if it is cached somewhere...

That was a knob that came with the [erlang-questions %d] behaviour I
tried to use. Now it should be back to old and normal again.

> 
> Thank-you for your attention.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> David
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: David Mercer [mailto:dmercer@REDACTED]
> > Sent: Monday, March 28, 2011 9:19 AM
> > To: 'Raimo Niskanen'
> > Subject: RE: [erlang-questions 76] Re: New Mailing list software
> > 
> > Yes, please.  The numbering has caused Outlook to no longer be able to
> > thread conversations.  Thank-you!
> > 
> > Cheers,
> > 
> > DBM
> > 
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: erlang-questions-bounces@REDACTED [mailto:erlang-questions-
> > > bounces@REDACTED] On Behalf Of Raimo Niskanen
> > > Sent: Monday, March 28, 2011 2:36 AM
> > > To: erlang-questions@REDACTED
> > > Subject: [erlang-questions 76] Re: New Mailing list software
> > >
> > > On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 02:44:54PM -0700, Simon Thompson wrote:
> > > > Something peculiar happening with header padding for me: getting
> > ints
> > > in headers so my automated filing is not spotting them ... (this
> > filing
> > > done before hitting client)
> > >
> > > Yes. It is auto numbering of posts. I thought it would be something
> > to
> > > facilitate threading in the clients, but seems to cause confusion.
> > > I think I will shut it off.
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Simon
> > > >
> > > > Sent from my iPhone
> > > >
> > > > On 25 Mar 2011, at 14:34, Toby Thain <toby@REDACTED>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > On 25/03/11 5:18 PM, Koener Antoine wrote:
> > > > >> Hi,
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Every single mail seems to be seen as Junk now in Apple Mail.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Is this just me ? :)
> > > > >
> > > > > Yes, it's just you; that is a client side function.
> > > > >
> > > > > --T
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> PS: I know that there's many other imap clients out there :-)
> > > > >> _______________________________________________
> > > > >> erlang-questions mailing list
> > > > >> erlang-questions@REDACTED
> > > > >> http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions
> > > > >>
> > > > >
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > erlang-questions mailing list
> > > > > erlang-questions@REDACTED
> > > > > http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > erlang-questions mailing list
> > > > erlang-questions@REDACTED
> > > > http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> > > / Raimo Niskanen, Erlang/OTP, Ericsson AB
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > erlang-questions mailing list
> > > erlang-questions@REDACTED
> > > http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions
> 

-- 

/ Raimo Niskanen, Erlang/OTP, Ericsson AB