[erlang-questions] Re: reverse engineering beam files / obfuscation ?

[Michael Turner]

On 2/16/2010, "Thomas Lindgren" <thomasl_erlang@REDACTED> wrote:
>In some fields, the pond isn't that large. In my experience,
>papers are usually reviewed by one's competitors.

By the same token, in some specialties it's often by one's close
buddies.  A friend of mine used to talk about "getting published in
beer-reviewed journals."  He got tenure at Columbia in part by not
doing it too much.  (He didn't like beer, as I remember.  A
professional handicap that he's managed to overcome somehow.)

-michael turner

On 2/16/2010, "Thomas Lindgren" <thomasl_erlang@REDACTED> wrote:

>
>
>
>
>----- Original Message ----
>> From: Alpar Juttner <ajuttner.list@REDACTED>
>>
>> In addition, review of a paper is normally done by an independent
>> reviewer, who must handle the paper confidentially. How did you get a
>> copy of the paper under review?
>
>
>In some fields, the pond isn't that large. In my experience, papers are usually reviewed by one's competitors. What other real experts in the topic are there?
>
>Best,
>Thomas
>
>
>
>
>
>________________________________________________________________
>erlang-questions (at) erlang.org mailing list.
>See http://www.erlang.org/faq.html
>To unsubscribe; mailto:erlang-questions-unsubscribe@REDACTED
>
>