Nested for-loops, there has to be a better way to do this

Steve Davis steven.charles.davis@REDACTED
Tue Aug 4 05:28:50 CEST 2009

No need to wonder. Have a read about fprof:apply.

On Aug 3, 8:51 pm, "Yves S. Garret" <yoursurrogate...@REDACTED>
> Cool.  But I do wonder, what are the performance hits compared to one
> larger function?  Reversing lists, returning values, etc.  That's one
> of the reasons why I made the 'monolithic' function that I did.

More information about the erlang-questions mailing list