Nested for-loops, there has to be a better way to do this
Tue Aug 4 05:28:50 CEST 2009
No need to wonder. Have a read about fprof:apply.
On Aug 3, 8:51 pm, "Yves S. Garret" <yoursurrogate...@REDACTED>
> Cool. But I do wonder, what are the performance hits compared to one
> larger function? Reversing lists, returning values, etc. That's one
> of the reasons why I made the 'monolithic' function that I did.
More information about the erlang-questions