[erlang-questions] Clustering through Multicast
Thu Apr 23 07:46:53 CEST 2009
Thank you for the link. I will run through the pasox protocol
On Wed, 2009-04-22 at 15:55 +0200, Hynek Vychodil wrote:
> It sounds more like paxos protocol works. Look at scalaris
> On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 10:17 AM, chaitanya Chalasani
> <chaitanya.chalasani@REDACTED> wrote:
> May be the solution exists, but the idea just popped and want
> to clarify if it really works this way.
> Instead of the regular cluster node and unicast load balance
> to multiple worker nodes, if we use the IP multicast to a
> group of servers with replicated mnesia and let each node
> attempt to start a transaction and only one node gets to act
> on it, based on the mnesia transaction write lock, will there
> be less latency in distributing the transactions. And also it
> might help in some cases wherein the delay in identifying dead
> node would not effect the transactions within.
> CHAITANYA CHALASANI
> erlang-questions mailing list
> --Hynek (Pichi) Vychodil
> Analyze your data in minutes. Share your insights instantly. Thrill
> your boss. Be a data hero!
> Try Good Data now for free: www.gooddata.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the erlang-questions