[erlang-questions] best way to implement a "barrier"
Joel Reymont
joelr1@REDACTED
Wed Oct 1 13:45:28 CEST 2008
On Oct 1, 2008, at 11:38 AM, Richard Carlsson wrote:
> How exact do you need the synchronization to be? The simplest barrier
> is a receive that waits for a start message
That's what I was thinking. The question then is how to ensure that
all processes get the start message more or less at the same time. I
guess this is the question of how long it takes to send 10k-50k start
messages.
> But if that is not exact
> enough (some have finished before others have even woken up), you
> might
> try a clock synchronization
Great suggestion!
Thanks, Joel
--
wagerlabs.com
More information about the erlang-questions
mailing list