[erlang-questions] Erlang 3000?
Michael T. Richter
ttmrichter@REDACTED
Mon Nov 17 11:18:58 CET 2008
On Sun, 2008-11-16 at 05:15 -0600, Steve Davis wrote:
> > therefore, far better, to change oneself than the language.
> I am coming around to that conclusion. I recently understood that whilst
> I had various initial concerns, I honestly couldn't think of a "better
> way of doing things" once I'd really thought through all the angles.
There are, however, some bona fide sharp edges in Erlang that could do
with some blunting. I'm looking askance at records here, for example,
as well as the inconsistency in the APIs that has been previously
mentioned.
--
Michael T. Richter <ttmrichter@REDACTED> (GoogleTalk:
ttmrichter@REDACTED)
I have to wonder why people think that when they can't manage local
personnel within easy strangling and shooting distance, then they can
manage personnel thousands of miles away that have different languages,
cultures, and business rules. (Joe Celko)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://erlang.org/pipermail/erlang-questions/attachments/20081117/d12f40c8/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://erlang.org/pipermail/erlang-questions/attachments/20081117/d12f40c8/attachment.bin>
More information about the erlang-questions
mailing list