[erlang-questions] Erlang 3000?
Steve Davis
steven.charles.davis@REDACTED
Sun Nov 16 12:15:13 CET 2008
Valentin Micic wrote:
> therefore, far better, to change oneself than the language.
I am coming around to that conclusion. I recently understood that whilst
I had various initial concerns, I honestly couldn't think of a "better
way of doing things" once I'd really thought through all the angles.
For a "certified Java professional", this has all been a bit of a
culture shock. So yes -- I too realize that it is (mostly) me that has
needed/does need to change.
Erlang/OTP may not have had a cathedral-like architectural plan but it
does have something buried in each line of library code that, while
intangible, is **much more important** - practical real-world experience.
More information about the erlang-questions
mailing list