[erlang-questions] Erlang 3000?

Steve Davis steven.charles.davis@REDACTED
Sun Nov 16 12:15:13 CET 2008


Valentin Micic wrote:
 > therefore, far better, to change oneself than the language.

I am coming around to that conclusion. I recently understood that whilst 
I had various initial concerns, I honestly couldn't think of a "better 
way of doing things" once I'd really thought through all the angles.

For a "certified Java professional", this has all been a bit of a 
culture shock. So yes -- I too realize that it is (mostly) me that has 
needed/does need to change.

Erlang/OTP may not have had a cathedral-like architectural plan but it 
does have something buried in each line of library code that, while 
intangible, is **much more important**  - practical real-world experience.



More information about the erlang-questions mailing list