[erlang-questions] newbie: why c.erl is special?

[Anthony Kong]

Is it already implemented? Because I found this document:

http://www.erlang.se/publications/packages.html

Anyway, I was unable to get it to work according to this info.

Cheers, Anthony

On Sun, Mar 2, 2008 at 12:38 AM, Thomas Lindgren
<thomasl_erlang@REDACTED> wrote:
>
>  --- shiwei xu <xushiweizh@REDACTED> wrote:
>
>  > I think flat module namespaces is a defect of erlang
>  > design.
>
>  Richard Carlsson proposed java-like packages some
>  years ago, and the code for them might still be
>  provided in OTP. (I thought they had some flaws, but
>  they might be what you want.)
>
>  http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/398052.html
>
>  The usual approach to handling name clashes without
>  packages is to use your 'approach 2', prefixing the
>  modules with their owner application.
>
>  Best,
>  Thomas
>
>
>
>
>       ____________________________________________________________________________________
>  Be a better friend, newshound, and
>  know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile.  Try it now.  http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ
>
>
>
>  _______________________________________________
>  erlang-questions mailing list
>  erlang-questions@REDACTED
>  http://www.erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions
>



-- 
/*--*/
Don't EVER make the mistake that you can design something better than
what you get from ruthless massively parallel trial-and-error with a
feedback cycle. That's giving your intelligence _much_ too much
credit.

- Linus Torvalds