[erlang-questions] newbie: why c.erl is special?
Wed Mar 5 10:24:59 CET 2008
Is it already implemented? Because I found this document:
Anyway, I was unable to get it to work according to this info.
On Sun, Mar 2, 2008 at 12:38 AM, Thomas Lindgren
> --- shiwei xu <xushiweizh@REDACTED> wrote:
> > I think flat module namespaces is a defect of erlang
> > design.
> Richard Carlsson proposed java-like packages some
> years ago, and the code for them might still be
> provided in OTP. (I thought they had some flaws, but
> they might be what you want.)
> The usual approach to handling name clashes without
> packages is to use your 'approach 2', prefixing the
> modules with their owner application.
> Be a better friend, newshound, and
> know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now. http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ
> erlang-questions mailing list
Don't EVER make the mistake that you can design something better than
what you get from ruthless massively parallel trial-and-error with a
feedback cycle. That's giving your intelligence _much_ too much
- Linus Torvalds
More information about the erlang-questions