[erlang-questions] newbie: why c.erl is special?
Sat Mar 1 14:38:20 CET 2008
--- shiwei xu <xushiweizh@REDACTED> wrote:
> I think flat module namespaces is a defect of erlang
Richard Carlsson proposed java-like packages some
years ago, and the code for them might still be
provided in OTP. (I thought they had some flaws, but
they might be what you want.)
The usual approach to handling name clashes without
packages is to use your 'approach 2', prefixing the
modules with their owner application.
Be a better friend, newshound, and
know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now. http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ
More information about the erlang-questions