[erlang-questions] Is erlang-questions setting Reply-To properly?
Mon Jul 14 08:40:27 CEST 2008
On Jul 11, 2008, at 11:05 PM, Alain O'Dea wrote:
> Interesting article. Thank you Lev. I had not realized the side-
> effects were so severe, but upon review they make perfect sense. I
> will use Reply All and maybe even get at the admins of other lists to
> remove this reply-to munging.
Also try these:
Reply-to considered useful:
Reply-to still considered harmful, really:
> On 10-Jul-08, at 10:59 PM, Lev Walkin wrote:
>> Alain O'Dea wrote:
>>> It looks like the list-serv for erlang-questions is leaving Reply-
>>> To blank instead of setting or overriding it to be "erlang-questions@REDACTED
>>> " as I would expect. This has lead me on multiple occasions to
>>> reply to the poster directly instead of replying to the thread. I
>>> find it very confusing.
>>> Is erlang-questions setting Reply-To properly?
>>> erlang-questions mailing list
> erlang-questions mailing list
More information about the erlang-questions