[erlang-questions] any performance benchmark comparisions for text processing between Erlang & Perl

Matt Williamson dawsdesign@REDACTED
Fri Aug 15 21:08:19 CEST 2008


I hear it sucks. See
http://www.erlang.org/pipermail/erlang-questions/2006-August/022596.html for
a port driver version which might at least approach Perl's.

2008/8/15 Eric Ho <drwho102003-erlang@REDACTED>

>  So how does its regexp's performance as compared to Perl's ?
>
>
> -eric
>
> --- On *Thu, 8/14/08, Richard A. O'Keefe <ok@REDACTED>* wrote:
>
> From: Richard A. O'Keefe <ok@REDACTED>
> Subject: Re: [erlang-questions] any performance benchmark comparisions for
> text processing between Erlang & Perl ?
> To: drwho102003-erlang@REDACTED
> Cc: erlang-questions@REDACTED
> Date: Thursday, August 14, 2008, 11:04 PM
>
> On 15 Aug 2008, at 7:04 am, Eric Ho wrote:
>
> > Just curious.
>
> Since Perl *was* designed to be a text processing language,
> and Erlang *wasn't*, it's not clear that any benchmarks
> that have been done tell us much except where the effort
>
> needs to go to make it better.
>
> For
>  example, R12B-3 includes the prototype regular
> expression implementation based on PCRE from
> http://www.erlang.org/eeps/eep-0011.html
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> erlang-questions mailing list
> erlang-questions@REDACTED
> http://www.erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://erlang.org/pipermail/erlang-questions/attachments/20080815/753067e9/attachment.htm>


More information about the erlang-questions mailing list