[erlang-questions] Memcached client implementation

Dustin Sallings dustin@REDACTED
Fri Sep 21 22:32:16 CEST 2007

On Sep 21, 2007, at 12:41 , Jeremy Wall wrote:

> I'm a darcs fan myself,  It's command set is small and simple and  
> is just as easy as git to share with. I'll use either of course.  
> but I like darcs for it's simplicity

	Any of git, mercurial, or darcs would be good, but that's a less  
important part.

	More importantly, I'd recommend just building the thing  
independently and keep the list(s) up with your progress.  Interested  
people may cooperate.

	Distributed revision control lowers the barrier to entry, but  
doesn't guarantee anyone will help.  Centralized revision control  
makes it a little harder, but doesn't guarantee people won't.

	I've thought about writing this client many times myself, but I have  
no personal use for it (the closest thing I have to a use has mnesia  
doing the work).

Dustin Sallings

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://erlang.org/pipermail/erlang-questions/attachments/20070921/3c8044ab/attachment.htm>

More information about the erlang-questions mailing list