[erlang-questions] Forget Erlang on the Java VM. More language on the Erlang VM are needed!

Joel Reymont joelr1@REDACTED
Wed Nov 28 16:13:44 CET 2007

On Nov 28, 2007, at 3:03 PM, Ulf Wiger (TN/EAB) wrote:

> When building an IDE, for example, would you not agree that strong
> GUI support etc is more important than having lightweight processes?

I would not build the GUI in Erlang if that's what you are asking.

> If Erlang, including distributed erlang, is implemented on e.g. the
> Mono VM, it ought to be perfectly feasible to have a heterogeneous  
> network of nodes where some are Mono-based.

You can have this without porting Erlang to Mono, just write 'ei' for  

> I'm not personally shopping for Erlang on any other VM, but I can
> remember many complaints (most recently at the EUC) about Erlang/OTP  
> not supporting the kind of enterprise interop technologies that many  
> take for granted.

I must be missing a point. What's wrong with jinterface and the (yet  
unexistant) clrinterface?

	Thanks, Joel


More information about the erlang-questions mailing list