[erlang-questions] some language changes

Mike McNally m5@REDACTED
Tue May 22 05:40:25 CEST 2007

I just subscribed and so can't hook directly into the "some language
changes thread", but hopefully this won't be lost:

I think it'd be really (REALLY) nice to have a "letrec" facility for
"fun" expressions, so that they could more easily recurse (kind-of
important in Erlang!).  Maybe something like "fun <atom>(...) -> ... end"
so that "<atom>" would be bound in the function appropriately.

[ I love pre-moistened towelettes ] Mike McNally -- m5@REDACTED

More information about the erlang-questions mailing list