[erlang-questions] Question about Erlang's term serialization for message passing

Christoph Dornheim cd5@REDACTED
Wed Mar 7 11:32:44 CET 2007

Bjorn Gustavsson <bjorn <at> erix.ericsson.se> writes:

> > I guess the former is true since otherwise message passing would lead to
> > problems such that data possibly needs more memory space in the receiving
> > process than in the sending one (think of sending [L,L] for L=[1,2,3] from
> > process P1 to P2: if something like term_to_binary is used for encoding the
> > received term needs the same space as [L,[1,2,3]] would have been sent).
> Such terms will indeed grow when sent to another process.

Thanks for sharing this information.
Is this (the growth of memory space for received data) just a theoretical
problem of applications sending that kind of data to remote processes or does it
happen sometimes in practice that an application runs out of memory caused by
this problem?

More information about the erlang-questions mailing list