[erlang-questions] Lisp syntax for Erlang

Matthew Dempsky matthew@REDACTED
Fri Dec 7 00:31:50 CET 2007

On 12/6/07, Robert Virding <rvirding@REDACTED> wrote:
> This seems to be more a system for defining libraries then an inclusive
> module system as in Erlang, the top program is not in a module.

I'm not familiar with the trainwreck-called-R6RS, but that statement
is not true for Scheme 48's module system.

More information about the erlang-questions mailing list