[erlang-questions] Erlang and autoconf/make

[Pupeno]

On Wednesday 15 November 2006 06:39, Romain Lenglet wrote:
> Yes, you're right, thanks!
> But I believed that pattern rules were a GNU Make'ism?

Oh, didn't know that.

> I believe that BSD Make supports only implicit rules, and not
> pattern rules. Therefore, I believe that implicit rules are more
> portable. Maybe I am wrong.
>
> Since Automake is supposed to generate Makefiles that do not
> require GNU Make, it may be a good idea to not depend on GNU
> Make in your Makefile.am.

Can any BSDer confirm this ?
-- 
Pupeno <pupeno@REDACTED> (http://pupeno.com)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://erlang.org/pipermail/erlang-questions/attachments/20061115/a703dc1e/attachment.bin>