Ulf Wiger (AL/EAB)
Mon Mar 20 16:02:47 CET 2006
This is basically what my talk was about at the EUC,
even though it didn't specifically focus on _large_
fsms, but rather on dealing with complex interaction
in state machines.
The problem with FIFO-style callback-oriented frameworks
is that they don't compose well, so if you want to
manage the fsms in the manner that you propose, you
still have to deal with a global state-event matrix.
If there is any chance at all that the global ordering
of events can be significant (*), you are asking for
trouble doing this in gen_fsm, or any framework with
(*) I suspect that if this is not the case, the fsms
probably don't need to be in the same process to
Even so, Joel Reymont posted an alternative approach:
It might be worth looking into.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-erlang-questions@REDACTED
> [mailto:owner-erlang-questions@REDACTED] On Behalf Of Serge
> Sent: den 20 mars 2006 14:44
> To: Erlang Questions
> Subject: large gen_fsms
> I wonder if someone could share their experience at dealing
> with large FSMs. We are in the midst of implementing an FSM
> which logically can be broken down in two groups of states.
> It would be good to be able to split these states among two
> separate modules, but gen_fsm doesn't allow to do this easily.
More information about the erlang-questions