Never trust a statistics you didn't forge yourself

[Ulf Wiger (AL/EAB)]

Marc van Woerkom wrote:
>
> It is not that this stuff is in desperate need of publicity. 
> As a rough estimation of publicity I just searched the ACM 
> Digital Library.
> Of 171,143 indexed items, we get following hits:
> 
>    Erlang      584
>    MPI        1641
>    PVM         670
>    Beowulf     226
>    Java      12592
>    Haskell     955
>    OCaml        88
>    Fortran   12588

How many of the hits on Erlang were about the 
Erlang formula? (:

BR,
Ulf W