Fri May 13 17:51:20 CEST 2005
On Fri, May 13, 2005 at 05:15:33PM +0200, Matthias Kretschmer wrote:
> On 2005-05-12 at 09:17:38 (+0200), klacke@REDACTED wrote:
> > On Wed, May 11, 2005 at 06:46:25PM -0700, Michael McDaniel wrote:
> > >
> > > Thank you for the recent release!
> > > FROM: #define RWBUFLEN 4096
> > > TO: #define RWBUFLEN (32*1024)
> > And this fix (which has been reported to the list a couple
> > of times) should go into the regular code since https POSTs
> > doesn't work without it. (If the post is > 4096 bytes)
> but wouldn't the fix above limit is to posts =< 32*1024 bytes?
> can you elaborate on this?
Maybe, maybe not. Need to study the code hard to understand
this exactly. Anyway, with the patch applied, POSTS larger than
(32*1024) also works. Without the patch only POSTS < 4096 work.
It may have to do something with the way SSL protocol clumps
data together into SSL records, it may also have something to
do with how the writer creates those SSL records.
Needs lots of deep codeinspection into libssl code to answer
Claes Wikstrom -- Caps lock is nowhere and
http://www.hyber.org -- everything is under control
More information about the erlang-questions