Poll: Packages use

[Vlad Dumitrescu]

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Thierry Mallard" <thierry@REDACTED>
>> * Should the use of packages become widespread, would it be useful to 
>> adopt some naming scheme so that package name clashes are avoided?

> Something like Java naming convention ( org.erlang.package ) ?

That was my first thought too, but it feels a little clumsy.

> Another option would be to make something like a service-tree :
> net.http.server.yaws
> net.xmpp.server.ejabberd

I think that might be a better idea. Not everything is a service, of course, 
and the Java structure does have the advantage that it makes the top levels 
unique.

> BTW, great job for Erlide, even in its current state : It really 
> demonstrate the possibilities of an integrated multi-OS plateform, IMHO.

Thank you for the kind words. So far, it's been nice to be able to 
concentrate on whatever I felt like for, but soon there will be long lists 
of bug reports ;-)

best regards,
Vlad