list comprehension question

[Håkan Stenholm]

Charles Blair wrote:

>in something like this:
>
>[X || X <- lists:seq(1,25)]
>
>is the result guaranteed to reflect the order of the generator
>
You'll get [1,2,3,4, ... , 25] as expected (I at least have never seen 
anything else), but I can't see that the documentation guarantees this 
in any formal way - except that all examples act in this way and that 
all listcomprehension code I have ever seen appears to assume this.

>, or
>not? 
>
>i'm working with a list of randomly generated results, and i want to
>print them in the order in which they were generated--is lists:foreach
>the way to go here? a list comprehension would be simpler to write and
>nicer to look at.
>
>thanks.
>
>
>
>
>  
>