Backtrack

Jani Launonen jabba@REDACTED
Wed Jan 12 16:49:15 CET 2005


On Wed, 12 Jan 2005, Mickael Remond wrote:

> Tiago Rodrigues Antao wrote:
>> As far as I can see Erlang has no concept of parameters that are both 
>> input/output and of backtrack. Am I wrong?
>
> No. You are right. The syntax of Erlang comes from Prolog, but the language 
> feature are different.
>
> Regarding inference, maybe the rule engine ERES, found in the Exat Agent 
> platform could be usefull to you (See: 
> http://www.diit.unict.it/users/csanto/exat/whats.html)
>
> -- 
> Mickaël Rémond
> http://www.erlang-projects.org/

I've kept my eye on Mercury --- a hybrid of functional and logic 
programming language. The Mercury has an experimental implicit parallelism 
implemented (got it? :)) and one can read it about at 
http://www.cs.mu.oz.au/research/mercury/information/papers.html#conway-thesis

The main site is at
http://www.cs.mu.oz.au/research/mercury/

It might be interesting for you. At least the implicit parallelism is 
interesting for me as the CMP/SMT -processors are coming.

Have a nice read :)

-+-+-+-
Jani Launonen 
Student. . . . . . . . . .University of Oulu, Dept. of El. & Inf. Eng.

"Life is what happens to you while you're busy making future plans."
  - Alfred E. Neuman


More information about the erlang-questions mailing list