Is erlang too small?

Richard Carlsson richardc@REDACTED
Wed May 12 12:14:57 CEST 2004

Zoltan Peter Toth wrote:
> I think the hierarchical namespace feature ("packages") is something 
> useful.
> Are there any plans to extend tool support for that ? In particular,
> - extending the erlc to generate a directory tree containing the beam files
> (like javac puts class files under the directory given via the -d option)
> - extending edoc to generate documentation and links in the proper 
> hierarchy.

This is already working in the new beta version. Get it at:

and report any problems to me. There are still a few things to
be ironed out.


PS. I wouldn't mind if edoc was included in the OTP distribution,
(together with the syntax tools and xmerl, which it needs).

More information about the erlang-questions mailing list