Hopefully simple problem

Bjorn Gustavsson bjorn@REDACTED
Mon Jan 19 09:51:05 CET 2004

Yes, using a real fun instead of a "tuple fun" is
recommended. That will be faster too, as a fun contains
a direct pointer to the code to be executed, while a
"tuple fun" requires a lookup in a hash table.

We will probably never be able to remove "tuple funs"
from the language (for backwards compatibility), but we
still recommend that you don't use them in new code.

/Bjorn (Erlang/OTP at Ericsson)

Vladimir Sekissov <svg@REDACTED> writes:

> Good day,
> carsten> This should work:
> carsten> 
> carsten> X = nnet:neuron (0, {nblah, bfunc}, {nblah, xfunc}, []).
> carsten> 
> carsten> A strange language Erlang is ;-)
> According to 
> http://www.erlang.se/workshop/2003/paper/p36-sagonas.pdf
> you should use ordinary function call instead of {Module, Function} if
> you wanted your code to be fully HiPE compatible.
> Best Regards,
> Vladimir Sekissov

Björn Gustavsson, Erlang/OTP, Ericsson AB

More information about the erlang-questions mailing list