Wed Sep 24 13:35:24 CEST 2003
Miguel Barreiro Paz wrote:
> Because development would be abysmally slow, as it is in GNU Hurd (yes,
> I'm wearing asbestos underwear today) and a couple of developers at most
> would understand the subtleties of the microkernel internals.
Well, I did say they _still_ haven't any product yet. So yes, maybe not
the best foundation, but as Vlad suggested there is more than enough to
> In my humble opinion Erlans (well, the ERTS) is already a virtual OS.
Yes, but "virtual" is the key word. Why not dispense with unnecessary
baggage and make it "physical"? Hopefully giving Erlang a replacement
for VxWorks... and I think a few people would *really* like that!
> Wouldn't running erlang inside erlang be beautiful?
The L4Linux project may be a bridge toward L4Erlang, but who _really_
wants this sooooo badly and can make time to scratch this itch?
More information about the erlang-questions