Use-defined guard (was: RE: Enhanced type guard syntax])
Mon Sep 22 17:05:42 CEST 2003
Sean Hinde writes:
> On Monday, September 22, 2003, at 06:21 am, Richard A. O'Keefe wrote:
> > Except for the unnecessarily ugly syntax and not being quite as fully
> > worked out, how is this different from my old "Abstract Patterns"
> > proposal?
> I can't seem to find this proposal online. Link anyone?
I have a copy. I could post it on the list, if Richard does not have
More information about the erlang-questions