Wed Jul 30 21:43:29 CEST 2003
This might be the case for mnesia_access and megaco_encoder but
then what about mnesia_backup, mnesia_frag_hash and megaco_user ?
My non-educated guess is that mnesia_access and megaco_encoder
doesn't even exist.
Shouldn't really the behaviours be defined or the behaviour
reference be removed ?
> --- Per Bergqvist <per@REDACTED> wrote:
> > Hi,
> > the behaviours thread seemed to gain some interested
> > but did
> > not answer my question ...
> > Q: Why would one specify a behaviour without the
> > target
> > module implementing behaviour_info function ? (as in
> > mnesia and
> > megaco).
> My educated guess is that someone forgot to include
> mnesia_access.erl in the distribution :-)
> Do you Yahoo!?
> The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo.
Synapse Systems AB
Phone: +46 709 686 685
More information about the erlang-questions