Need for new compiler directives to supress warnings
Per Bergqvist
per@REDACTED
Sat Jul 26 12:25:22 CEST 2003
Fine by me.
/Per
-------------------
> This could pretty easily be added.
> Although I would suggest a single declaration type
> for all such "pragmas":
>
> -pragma({redefine, {size,1}}).
>
> -pragma({use_obsolete, {erlang,hash,2}}).
>
> /Richard
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Per Bergqvist" <per@REDACTED>
> To: <erlang-questions@REDACTED>
> Sent: Saturday, July 26, 2003 7:56 AM
> Subject: Need for new compiler directives to supress warnings
>
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I think support of some directive to supress specific warnings
> > should be added to the compiler/lint in future versions.
> >
> > The two most obvious things I would like to see is:
> > 1) supression of warning definition of bif.
> > this warning is, i guess, the result of the uncertainty of
scope
> > rules in the dark ages.
> > i would like to be able to:
> > -redefine_bif([size/1]).
> >
> > 2) supression of warning on use of obsolete functions.
> > In some case use of obsolete is absolutely necessary
> > like the use of hash for backward compatibility reasons.
> > could be something like:
> >
> > -use_obsolete(erlang, [hash/2]).
> >
> > Comments ?
> >
> > /Per
> >
> > =========================================================
> > Per Bergqvist
> > Synapse Systems AB
> > Phone: +46 709 686 685
> > Email: per@REDACTED
> >
> >
>
=========================================================
Per Bergqvist
Synapse Systems AB
Phone: +46 709 686 685
Email: per@REDACTED
More information about the erlang-questions
mailing list